Occupier lease software pricing per active lease and when lease abstraction is the cheaper buy
Occupier is a tenant-side lease management and lease accounting platform for multi-location operators and corporate real estate teams. It does publish how it prices, though not what: an annual subscription per active lease, on a Basic, Professional or Enterprise tier, with a minimum of 20 leases in each tier, unlimited users, and lease accounting, deal management and other modules added on top. Abstraction comes through its AI Abstractor with human review on every lease, or as a professional service. If you want the abstraction itself rather than the platform, LeaseAbstracts does that piece self-serve at a published price.
HOW TO CHOOSE
LeaseAbstracts vs Occupier
A fair, factual comparison. We differentiate on self-serve speed, per-lease pricing, source-linking, and export, not on disparaging anyone.
What the product is
Occupier combines transaction management, lease administration, and ASC 842 lease accounting in one tenant-side platform. LeaseAbstracts is abstraction software: upload a lease, get structured, source-linked data.
How abstraction is delivered
Occupier pairs an AI Abstractor with human review on every lease, pulling dates, rent and clauses straight into its platform, and also sells lease abstraction, amendment support and audits as optional professional services. LeaseAbstracts is self-serve: you run it yourself, in minutes, at plan pricing, and export the result.
Portfolio size
Occupier states that each tier includes a minimum of 20 leases, so the smallest subscription is priced as if you hold 20. LeaseAbstracts works from a single lease upward, which suits brokers, law firms, and deal teams as well as portfolio owners.
Lease accounting
Occupier produces ASC 842 schedules and journal entries inside the platform. LeaseAbstracts extracts the underlying lease terms your accounting team needs, and exports them; it is not a general ledger.
Where Occupier is the better fit
If you are a corporate tenant that needs ASC 842 compliance, transaction pipeline, and lease administration in one system with white-glove support, that is exactly what Occupier sells and abstraction alone will not replace it.
WHERE LEASEABSTRACTS FITS
LeaseAbstracts fits teams that need lease data now, verified and exportable, without a services engagement or a platform rollout. If your accounting stack is already set, abstract the leases, export the schedule, and feed the system you have.
Occupier vs LeaseAbstracts at a glance
Occupier sells a tenant-side system of record with services attached. LeaseAbstracts sells the extraction step, done fast and verifiably, for anyone who needs the data.
| Occupier | LeaseAbstracts | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Lease management and ASC 842 lease accounting | AI lease abstraction software |
| Primary buyer | Corporate tenants and internal real estate teams | Property managers, landlords, brokers, law firms, deal teams |
| Minimum | 20 leases per tier, priced per active lease | One lease or thousands |
| Abstraction | AI Abstractor with human review, or a paid service | Self-serve, the core product |
| Source-linked fields | Not the stated differentiator | Every field links to its page and clause |
| Lease accounting | ASC 842 schedules and journal entries | Extracts the ASC 842 inputs, exports them |
| Getting started | Demo, onboarding, implementation | Upload a lease and see the abstract |
Occupier publishes its pricing structure but no dollar figures, and services are quoted separately. Ask for a written quote covering both software and abstraction services before comparing, and verify current terms with Occupier.
How much does Occupier cost?
Occupier does not publish a dollar figure, but its pricing pages describe the structure in more detail than most vendors in this category. Every customer starts with Lease Administration on a Basic or Professional tier, with Enterprise above them. Pricing is per lease and per module on an annual subscription.
| Pricing element | What Occupier states |
|---|---|
| Unit | Per active lease, per module, annual subscription |
| Minimum | Each tier includes a minimum of 20 leases; more leases are priced per lease |
| What counts | Active real estate leases and owned properties; expired or terminated leases do not count |
| Users | Unlimited, no per-seat fees |
| Add-on modules | Lease Accounting, Deal Management, Business Licenses, Equipment leases |
| Services | Abstraction, data migration and training quoted separately by portfolio size and complexity |
Two things follow for a buyer. First, the 20-lease minimum makes Occupier a portfolio purchase: a business with eight locations pays for twenty. Second, if your finance team needs ASC 842 schedules inside Occupier, Lease Accounting is a separate module that requires Lease Administration underneath it, so price both. For a side by side view of what other vendors publish, see the lease abstraction software pricing comparison. If Visual Lease is the other name on your shortlist, Occupier vs Visual Lease pricing puts the two quotes side by side. If the Yardi tenant platform is the other name on your list, see Occupier vs Yardi Corom pricing. If your finance team is pushing for a lease accounting subledger instead, Occupier vs FinQuery pricing compares the two buying motions.
The services fee is the part people miss
Platform pricing is only half the number. When abstraction is delivered as a service, the cost of getting your existing portfolio into the system is a separate line item, quoted per lease, and it is usually the larger of the two in year one. A 120-lease portfolio abstracted as a professional service is a meaningful project with a meaningful invoice and a queue.
That is worth paying when the leases are complex and you want someone else accountable for the output. It is worth avoiding when you can produce the same structured data yourself in an afternoon and spot-check it against the source. The honest test is your own review time: if the tool source-links every field, verification is fast, and self-serve wins on both cost and turnaround.
If you need ASC 842, what actually has to come out of the lease
Lease accounting fails on inputs, not on math. The schedule is only as good as the terms someone pulled from the document:
- Commencement date and the non-cancellable term
- Fixed payments, escalations, and free-rent periods
- Renewal and termination options, and whether exercise is reasonably certain
- Tenant improvement allowances and other lease incentives
- Variable payments and the index or rate they track
LeaseAbstracts pulls these into a structured ASC 842 input set, source-linked, so whoever owns the schedule can trace every assumption back to a clause. If your accounting system already does the calculation, this is the piece you are missing.
Choosing between a platform and an abstraction tool
Ask one question: is the recurring workflow the value, or is the data? If your team logs in weekly to manage transactions, approve accruals, and answer auditors, buy the platform. If you need accurate lease terms for a diligence file, a rent roll, a CAM audit, or a client deliverable, buy abstraction and keep your existing stack.
Plenty of teams end up doing both: abstract with a fast, verifiable tool, then load the output into whatever platform they run. Because LeaseAbstracts exports to Excel, CSV, and Yardi or MRI mapped formats, that path stays open. Compare the full field in our best lease abstraction software roundup, or see how we stack up against Visual Lease.
FAQ
Common questions
What is the best Occupier alternative?
For tenant-side lease accounting and administration, Visual Lease, Leasecake, and Prophia are the usual comparisons. If what you need is the lease data rather than a platform, a self-serve abstraction tool like LeaseAbstracts delivers structured, source-linked terms you can export into whatever system you already run.
How much does Occupier cost?
Occupier publishes no dollar figure. Its pricing page says pricing is per lease and per module on an annual subscription, each tier includes a minimum of 20 leases with additional leases priced per lease, users are unlimited, and only active leases count. Implementation services such as abstraction, data migration and training are quoted separately by portfolio size.
Does Occupier do lease abstraction?
Yes, in two ways. Its AI Abstractor extracts critical dates, rent schedules and clauses into the Occupier platform with a person reviewing every lease, and it also sells lease abstraction as an optional professional service. Both feed Occupier itself. If you need the lease data in your own system, a standalone abstraction tool exports it.
Does Occupier have a minimum number of leases?
Yes. Occupier states that each pricing tier includes a minimum of 20 leases, with additional leases priced per lease, and that only active leases count toward the total. A business with fewer than 20 locations therefore pays for 20. Users are unlimited on every tier.
Do I need a lease management platform for ASC 842?
Not always. ASC 842 needs accurate inputs, term, payments, escalations, options, and incentives, and a system that can calculate and post the schedules. If your accounting system already handles the calculation, extracting reliable inputs from the leases may be the only gap you have.
More lease abstraction comparisons
Try the self-serve, source-linked alternative
Upload a lease, review a source-linked abstract, and export to a spreadsheet you own. No contract.