Occupier alternative: lease abstraction without the platform contract
Occupier is a tenant-side lease management and lease accounting platform, generally aimed at internal real estate teams running 30 or more leases, with abstraction offered as a paid service alongside the software. If you want the abstraction itself rather than the platform and the services engagement, Leaseabstracts does that piece self-serve.
HOW TO CHOOSE
Leaseabstracts vs Occupier
A fair, factual comparison. We differentiate on self-serve speed, per-lease pricing, source-linking, and export, not on disparaging anyone.
What the product is
Occupier combines transaction management, lease administration, and ASC 842 lease accounting in one tenant-side platform. Leaseabstracts is abstraction software: upload a lease, get structured, source-linked data.
How abstraction is delivered
Occupier offers lease abstraction, amendments, CAM reconciliation, and audits through its leasing team for an additional services fee. Leaseabstracts is self-serve: you run it yourself, in minutes, at plan pricing.
Portfolio size
Occupier positions itself for companies managing roughly 30 or more leases. Leaseabstracts works from a single lease upward, which suits brokers, law firms, and deal teams as well as portfolio owners.
Lease accounting
Occupier produces ASC 842 schedules and journal entries inside the platform. Leaseabstracts extracts the underlying lease terms your accounting team needs, and exports them; it is not a general ledger.
Where Occupier is the better fit
If you are a corporate tenant that needs ASC 842 compliance, transaction pipeline, and lease administration in one system with white-glove support, that is exactly what Occupier sells and abstraction alone will not replace it.
WHERE LEASEABSTRACTS FITS
Leaseabstracts fits teams that need lease data now, verified and exportable, without a services engagement or a platform rollout. If your accounting stack is already set, abstract the leases, export the schedule, and feed the system you have.
Last updated July 2026
Occupier vs Leaseabstracts at a glance
Occupier sells a tenant-side system of record with services attached. Leaseabstracts sells the extraction step, done fast and verifiably, for anyone who needs the data.
| Occupier | Leaseabstracts | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Lease management and ASC 842 lease accounting | AI lease abstraction software |
| Primary buyer | Corporate tenants and internal real estate teams | Property managers, landlords, brokers, law firms, deal teams |
| Typical portfolio | Positioned for roughly 30+ leases | One lease or thousands |
| Abstraction | Available as a paid service alongside the software | Self-serve, the core product |
| Source-linked fields | Not the stated differentiator | Every field links to its page and clause |
| Lease accounting | ASC 842 schedules and journal entries | Extracts the ASC 842 inputs, exports them |
| Getting started | Demo, onboarding, implementation | Upload a lease and see the abstract |
Occupier does not publish a full price list; reported entry pricing sits in a wide range and services are quoted separately. Ask for a written quote covering both software and abstraction services before comparing, and verify current terms with Occupier.
The services fee is the part people miss
Platform pricing is only half the number. When abstraction is delivered as a service, the cost of getting your existing portfolio into the system is a separate line item, quoted per lease, and it is usually the larger of the two in year one. A 120-lease portfolio abstracted as a professional service is a meaningful project with a meaningful invoice and a queue.
That is worth paying when the leases are complex and you want someone else accountable for the output. It is worth avoiding when you can produce the same structured data yourself in an afternoon and spot-check it against the source. The honest test is your own review time: if the tool source-links every field, verification is fast, and self-serve wins on both cost and turnaround.
If you need ASC 842, what actually has to come out of the lease
Lease accounting fails on inputs, not on math. The schedule is only as good as the terms someone pulled from the document:
- Commencement date and the non-cancellable term
- Fixed payments, escalations, and free-rent periods
- Renewal and termination options, and whether exercise is reasonably certain
- Tenant improvement allowances and other lease incentives
- Variable payments and the index or rate they track
Leaseabstracts pulls these into a structured ASC 842 input set, source-linked, so whoever owns the schedule can trace every assumption back to a clause. If your accounting system already does the calculation, this is the piece you are missing.
Choosing between a platform and an abstraction tool
Ask one question: is the recurring workflow the value, or is the data? If your team logs in weekly to manage transactions, approve accruals, and answer auditors, buy the platform. If you need accurate lease terms for a diligence file, a rent roll, a CAM audit, or a client deliverable, buy abstraction and keep your existing stack.
Plenty of teams end up doing both: abstract with a fast, verifiable tool, then load the output into whatever platform they run. Because Leaseabstracts exports to Excel, CSV, and Yardi or MRI mapped formats, that path stays open. Compare the full field in our best lease abstraction software roundup, or see how we stack up against Visual Lease.
FAQ
Common questions
What is the best Occupier alternative?
For tenant-side lease accounting and administration, Visual Lease, Leasecake, and Prophia are the usual comparisons. If what you need is the lease data rather than a platform, a self-serve abstraction tool like Leaseabstracts delivers structured, source-linked terms you can export into whatever system you already run.
How much does Occupier cost?
Occupier does not publish a full price list. Reported entry pricing spans a wide range depending on portfolio size, and abstraction, amendments, CAM reconciliation, and audits are quoted as additional services. Ask for a written quote that covers both the subscription and the one-time abstraction of your existing leases.
Does Occupier do lease abstraction?
Yes, through its leasing team as a paid service rather than as a self-serve feature. That suits teams who want someone else accountable for the output. It is slower and costlier than running abstraction yourself when the tool lets you verify each field against the source clause.
Do I need a lease management platform for ASC 842?
Not always. ASC 842 needs accurate inputs, term, payments, escalations, options, and incentives, and a system that can calculate and post the schedules. If your accounting system already handles the calculation, extracting reliable inputs from the leases may be the only gap you have.
More lease abstraction comparisons
Try the self-serve, source-linked alternative
Upload a lease, review a source-linked abstract, and export to a spreadsheet you own. No contract.